Elena Pridankina vs Celine Naef Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 01 Mar at 07:15 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

E. Pridankina vs C. Naef

Elena Pridankina
Elena Pridankina

Flag RUS RUS

w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
Celine Naef
Celine Naef

Flag SUI SUI

w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l

2

Win

2

Played

0

Win

20
Age
20
-
Height
-
201
C. Rank
268
168
Best Rank
121
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$81.6K
Career Money
$220.5K
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Pridankina 2 - 0 Naef

They have played 5 sets in total, with Elena Pridankina winning 4 and Celine Naef winning 1. The last match between Elena Pridankina and Celine Naef was at the W75 Trnava, 01-03-2025, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with Elena Pridankina getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Pridankina2
Naef0
Last 2 H2H Matches:

(SFW75 Trnava(03-01-25)

I.hard
RUS Flag
Elena Pridankina
6
6
SUI Flag
Celine Naef
4
3

(R1W75 Maribor(03-19-24)

I.hard
RUS Flag
Elena Pridankina
6
1
7
SUI Flag
Celine Naef
2
6
6

E. Pridankina vs C. Naef H2H Profile

Stats
$81,600Career Prize Money$220,512
67.80% (160-76)Career Total W/L62.38% (126-76)
2Indoor0
6Titles7
2Total H2H Matches0
33.33% (1-2)YTD Win/Loss100.00% (1-0)

E. Pridankina vs C. Naef Match Preview:

When it comes to second serve performance, Naef is firing up quite a storm, winning 41.92% of points in their recent encounters. Meanwhile, Pridankina seems to occasionally drop the second serve ball, scoring 36.12%. And just like predicting the outcome of the spaghetti-eating contest, this stat closely relates to match-forecasting accuracy.

Ah, but let's return to the return game stats! Recently, Naef's been quick on their feet, snatching 46% of their rival's second serve points. However, Pridankina, with their quick wit and reflexes, claims victory here with 51.87%. But wait, there's more! When it comes to first serve returns, Naef is ahead by a hair at 30.4% while Pridankina edges them out with 31.33%. Clearly, deciding who's the favorite in this head-to-head duel involves a delicate dance of stats interpretation.

If you ever find yourself under pressure (or in an intense tennis match), saving breakpoints becomes your superpower. Naef, with their cape fluttering in the tennis wind, saves breakpoints 45.56% of the time. Pridankina, not far behind, pulls off a heroic 43.68% save rate. Surely, these numbers are pivotal for those in-game betting strategists plotting their victory plans.

Broadening our view, Naef has clinched 59.38% of their matches over the past year, gallantly sporting a win/loss record of 38/26. Not to be outdone, Pridankina boasts a 62.69% win rate, standing tall with a 42/25 tally. In the world of head-to-head predictions, these stats sketch an intriguing picture.

Diving into surface specialization, Naef has a love affair with indoor hard courts, boasting a 74% win rate. However, the grass courts conspire against them as they settle with 50%. In contrast, Pridankina thrives on indoor hard courts with a 75% success rate while their Achilles' heel lies on hard courts with a mere 68% victory percentage.

Looking at player level, Naef has spent most of their year charming audiences at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, waltzing away with a 66.67% victory rate. Pridankina, performing the same dance in the same venue, clocks in a respectable 66.1%. It's as if the tournaments whisper sweet encouragement to each of them equally.

Head-to-head bouts reveal a victorious Pridankina, with Naef unable to break their 0-game winning streak against them. Oh, how the tides can shift! Of the three sets played, Naef twirled away with one, while Pridankina secured two. Their last duel saw Pridankina delightedly emerging triumphant in a nail-biting three-set encounter.

In high-stakes moments, they've ventured into deciding sets once, with Naef observing from the sidelines as Pridankina danced away with the victory. They faced off in only one tiebreak, where Lady Luck favored Pridankina. When it comes to their foes, Naef faced off against players with an average rank of 210.42, giving them a touch of the elite experience. Pridankina, perhaps challenging themselves a bit less, faced players with an average rank of 305.13.

Considering their deciding set escapades over the last year, Naef shines with a sparkling 63% success rate, while Pridankina follows behind at a more modest 48%. If the match dashes to a deciding set showdown, these stats might just guide the prophetic pundit. In the heat of breakpoint conversion, Naef disappoints only 62.31% of the time, with Pridankina squandering a slightly warmer 66.67% of chances to disrupt their opponent’s serve.

To wrap it all up with a flourish, based on an intricate ballet of stats and a sprinkle of humor, Pridankina looks likely to hold the upper hand in this impending face-off on the tennis court.

Elena Pridankina vs Celine Naef Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Pridankina vs C. Naef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
2H2H Matches Won0
4Sets Won1
26Games Won21
5Aces (Total)8
8Total Double Faults12
2:5:12Average Match Time2:5:12
66% (105/159)1st Serve %58% (98/168)
65% (68/105)1st Serve Win %63% (62/98)
50% (27/54)2nd Serve Win %46% (32/70)
36% (8/22)Break Pts Won %33% (6/18)
44% (74/168)Return Points Win %40% (64/159)
100% (2/2)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Pridankina 42%, Naef 47%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pridankina 57%, Naef 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Pridankina 49%, Naef 58%.

E. Pridankina Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardJiangxi Open - Jiujiang - 27-10-2025

R2

SUIV. Golubic
L
6-0 4-6 7-5

R1

CHNY. Yuan
W
6-2 3-6 7-6(5)

Q3

JPNR. Saigo
L
6-2 6-3

Q1

CHNZ. Li
W
6-0 4-6 7-5
HardWTA 125 Jinan Open - Jinan - 13-10-2025

R1

RUSP. Iatcenko
L
1-6 6-4 6-2

C. Naef Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardW75 Glasgow - 27-10-2025

R1

SUIS. Bandecchi
L
6-2 6-4
HardTorneo Internazionale - Rovereto - 20-10-2025

R1

CROJ. Fett
L
6-4 6-3
ClayLexus Tolentino Open - Tolentino - 15-09-2025

R1

EGYM. Sherif
L
6-2 6-1
ClayOpen Internacional de San Sebastian - San Sebastian - 08-09-2025

R1

ESPI. Burillo
L
3-6 7-6(3) 6-1
HardU.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025

Q1

ESPL. Romero
L
6-4 6-4
banner

E. Pridankina vs C. Naef Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
67.80% (160/76)YTD Win/Loss62.38% (126/76)
65.66% (348/182)Sets Win/Loss59.49% (282/192)
57.28% (2716/2026)Games Win/Loss54.30% (2363/1989)
65.45% (72/38)Hard Win/Loss53.33% (16/14)
69.77% (60/26)Clay Win/Loss50.98% (26/25)
71.79% (28/11)Indoor Hard W/L71.72% (71/28)
0.00% (0/1)Grass Win/Loss59.09% (13/9)
0.16Aces Per Game0.28
379Aces Total598
0.32Double Faults Per Game0.22
731Total Double Faults475
1:34:50Average Match Time1:36:45
391.06Average Opponent Rank322.22
65% (9442/14549)1st Serve %60% (8306/13952)
64% (6030/9442)1st Serve Win %64% (5336/8306)
46% (2328/5106)2nd Serve Win %49% (2740/5646)
50% (1051/2116)Break Points Won % (Total)50% (864/1737)
49% (7286/15014)Return Points Win %46% (6360/13911)
20.00% (1/4)Slam W/L42.11% (8/11)
0% (0/0)Masters W/L0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)Cups W/L20.00% (1/4)
50.00% (7/7)Main Tour W/L37.50% (3/5)
67.24% (117/57)Challenger W/L65.58% (101/53)
81.40% (35/8)Futures W/L86.67% (13/2)
68% (156/230)Best of 3 Sets Win %63% (126/201)
0% (0/0)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
56% (24/43)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)53% (21/40)
50% (32/64)Deciding Set Win %58% (40/69)
89% (163/145)1st Set Won, Won Match86% (118/102)
11% (163/18)1st Set Won, Lost Match14% (118/16)
19% (73/14)1st Set Lost, Won Match29% (84/24)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

12:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
NEDN. ViskerLL
GERT. Gentzsch
W1
2.68
W2
1.4
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
RUSA. Binda8
EGYM. B. SobhyWC
W1
1.52
W2
2.33
12:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ESPM. Damas
ITAL. Giustino6
W1
2.64
W2
1.41
04:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
GERC. Negritu
ARGF. D. Acosta3
W1
3.94
W2
1.2
10:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ARGA. Collarini8
ARGM. Kestelboim
W1
1.39
W2
2.72
02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. Duckworth1
AUSM. Dellavedova
W1
1.056
W2
7.1