Elena Pridankina vs Celine Naef Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Mar at 07:15 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Pridankina vs C. Naef

RUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win

SUI
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Pridankina 2 - 0 Naef
They have played 5 sets in total, with Elena Pridankina winning 4 and Celine Naef winning 1. The last match between Elena Pridankina and Celine Naef was at the W75 Trnava, 01-03-2025, Round: SF, Surface: I.hard, with Elena Pridankina getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pridankina | 2 |
| Naef | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) W75 Trnava(03-01-25)
(R1) W75 Maribor(03-19-24)
E. Pridankina vs C. Naef H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $81,600 | Career Prize Money | $220,512 |
| 67.80% (160-76) | Career Total W/L | 62.38% (126-76) |
| 2 | Indoor | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 7 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
E. Pridankina vs C. Naef Match Preview:
When it comes to second serve performance, Naef is firing up quite a storm, winning 41.92% of points in their recent encounters. Meanwhile, Pridankina seems to occasionally drop the second serve ball, scoring 36.12%. And just like predicting the outcome of the spaghetti-eating contest, this stat closely relates to match-forecasting accuracy.
Ah, but let's return to the return game stats! Recently, Naef's been quick on their feet, snatching 46% of their rival's second serve points. However, Pridankina, with their quick wit and reflexes, claims victory here with 51.87%. But wait, there's more! When it comes to first serve returns, Naef is ahead by a hair at 30.4% while Pridankina edges them out with 31.33%. Clearly, deciding who's the favorite in this head-to-head duel involves a delicate dance of stats interpretation.
If you ever find yourself under pressure (or in an intense tennis match), saving breakpoints becomes your superpower. Naef, with their cape fluttering in the tennis wind, saves breakpoints 45.56% of the time. Pridankina, not far behind, pulls off a heroic 43.68% save rate. Surely, these numbers are pivotal for those in-game betting strategists plotting their victory plans.
Broadening our view, Naef has clinched 59.38% of their matches over the past year, gallantly sporting a win/loss record of 38/26. Not to be outdone, Pridankina boasts a 62.69% win rate, standing tall with a 42/25 tally. In the world of head-to-head predictions, these stats sketch an intriguing picture.
Diving into surface specialization, Naef has a love affair with indoor hard courts, boasting a 74% win rate. However, the grass courts conspire against them as they settle with 50%. In contrast, Pridankina thrives on indoor hard courts with a 75% success rate while their Achilles' heel lies on hard courts with a mere 68% victory percentage.
Looking at player level, Naef has spent most of their year charming audiences at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, waltzing away with a 66.67% victory rate. Pridankina, performing the same dance in the same venue, clocks in a respectable 66.1%. It's as if the tournaments whisper sweet encouragement to each of them equally.
Head-to-head bouts reveal a victorious Pridankina, with Naef unable to break their 0-game winning streak against them. Oh, how the tides can shift! Of the three sets played, Naef twirled away with one, while Pridankina secured two. Their last duel saw Pridankina delightedly emerging triumphant in a nail-biting three-set encounter.
In high-stakes moments, they've ventured into deciding sets once, with Naef observing from the sidelines as Pridankina danced away with the victory. They faced off in only one tiebreak, where Lady Luck favored Pridankina. When it comes to their foes, Naef faced off against players with an average rank of 210.42, giving them a touch of the elite experience. Pridankina, perhaps challenging themselves a bit less, faced players with an average rank of 305.13.
Considering their deciding set escapades over the last year, Naef shines with a sparkling 63% success rate, while Pridankina follows behind at a more modest 48%. If the match dashes to a deciding set showdown, these stats might just guide the prophetic pundit. In the heat of breakpoint conversion, Naef disappoints only 62.31% of the time, with Pridankina squandering a slightly warmer 66.67% of chances to disrupt their opponent’s serve.
To wrap it all up with a flourish, based on an intricate ballet of stats and a sprinkle of humor, Pridankina looks likely to hold the upper hand in this impending face-off on the tennis court.
Elena Pridankina vs Celine Naef Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Pridankina vs C. Naef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 21 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:5:12 | Average Match Time | 2:5:12 |
| 66% (105/159) | 1st Serve % | 58% (98/168) |
| 65% (68/105) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (62/98) |
| 50% (27/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (32/70) |
| 36% (8/22) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (6/18) |
| 44% (74/168) | Return Points Win % | 40% (64/159) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Pridankina Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-0 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
C. Naef Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||

E. Pridankina vs C. Naef Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.80% (160/76) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.38% (126/76) |
| 65.66% (348/182) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.49% (282/192) |
| 57.28% (2716/2026) | Games Win/Loss | 54.30% (2363/1989) |
| 65.45% (72/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 69.77% (60/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.98% (26/25) |
| 71.79% (28/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.72% (71/28) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 379 | Aces Total | 598 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 731 | Total Double Faults | 475 |
| 1:34:50 | Average Match Time | 1:36:45 |
| 391.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 322.22 |
| 65% (9442/14549) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8306/13952) |
| 64% (6030/9442) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (5336/8306) |
| 46% (2328/5106) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2740/5646) |
| 50% (1051/2116) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (864/1737) |
| 49% (7286/15014) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6360/13911) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Main Tour W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 67.24% (117/57) | Challenger W/L | 65.58% (101/53) |
| 81.40% (35/8) | Futures W/L | 86.67% (13/2) |
| 68% (156/230) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (126/201) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (24/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (21/40) |
| 50% (32/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (40/69) |
| 89% (163/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (118/102) |
| 11% (163/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (118/16) |
| 19% (73/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (84/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
